The Evidence
Mapping the evidence
Report on South African interventions to prevent Violence against women and children
The key objective of creating this map was to enable policymakers, civil society organisations, and research institutions to quickly identify the extent to which there is evidence to support the effectiveness of violence prevention interventions.
More than 54 programmes, policies and local interventions were identified, some local and some with broad geographic reach. The following information was captured for each programme, policy or intervention:
- Name of the intervention, programme or protocol
- Does it address violence against women?
- Does it address violence against children?
- Does it address men’s violence against other men?
- Is the programme or intervention being implemented currently?
- Who is implementing it?
- Where is it being implemented?
- Has it been evaluated?
- Is it linked to policy? If yes, which policy?
- Who is responsible for this policy?
- Is the policy costed?
- Is there a mechanism for the intervention or programme to be taken to scale? If yes, what?
View the maps
Parenting programmes
Life skills programmes for young people
Responsive services and protocols
GBV Prevention Programmes
Community safety interventions
Other interventions
Resources
This evidence gap map was created by the Institute for Security Studies in conjunction with CLEAR-AA at Wits University and the African Centre for Evidence at the University of Johannesburg.
Report on how the problem of violence against women and children is represented in South African intervention research
This report presents an analysis of 57 research papers that were included in an evidence map of South African interventions to prevent violence against women and children between 1990 and 2018. A feminist policy analysis methodology that asks, ‘What is the problem represented to be?’ was applied to find out how researchers define the problem of violence, the assumptions and presuppositions that underpin the problem definition, the silences and the impact on policy and practice of how the problem is represented.